Stop overthinking: getting out of rumination
Replaying Tuesday's conversation, analysing why you are the way you are, wondering what he meant, and going to bed at midnight with the same questions you had at six in the evening. This guide explains the difference between thinking and ruminating, why rumination gives the illusion of being useful, and what actually gets you out of it.
In short
This guide is for adults who think too much: those who replay the past, endlessly analyse their emotions, dissect other people's intentions and exhaust themselves looking for answers that do not come. It describes what research has established about rumination — its close link with depression and anxiety, and the difference between thinking abstractly and thinking concretely — and offers tools that have been evaluated: changing the level of thought, retraining attention, acting rather than analysing.
- Topic
- Emotions · Anxiety
- Who it's for
- For yourself
- Languages
- FR · EN · DE · IT · ES · ZH · AR
Français · English · Deutsch · Italiano · Español · 中文 · العربية
The programme
The rest is for members
Create your access to read this programme in full, along with every other resource.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between ruminating and thinking? Thinking leads to a decision or an action, happens at a concrete level, and stops. Ruminating goes round "why", stays abstract, leads nowhere and worsens mood. The practical test comes down to three questions: am I moving forward, do I feel better, have I already had exactly this thought this week?
Is distracting yourself not running away? That depends on the moment. Distracting yourself so as never to face a question that calls for a decision is avoidance. Engaging in an absorbing activity when the loop has already started and is leading nowhere is the best documented response. The difference is the sorting: actionable or not.
I feel that by thinking about it I will end up understanding: is that wrong? That is the belief that maintains rumination, and it can be tested. Look at your diary: how many conclusions in two weeks? The work on the subject shows that rumination degrades problem solving. Solutions arrive while writing, while walking, while talking — not at the end of the third hour.
Why is it worse at night? Because there is no longer anything to occupy your attention, because tiredness darkens thought, and because darkness removes the landmarks. A useful rule: never draw a conclusion between two and six in the morning. What seems final at four seems manageable at nine.
Does talking to someone help? That depends on the form. Talking in order to examine a situation and decide helps a great deal. Telling the same story on a loop with someone who is indignant along with you increases the distress of both. Ask those close to you to put the concrete question to you: "what do you want to do?"
How long before things change? Spotting improves within one to two weeks. The switch to the concrete takes two to three weeks of practice. A clear reduction in the total time generally appears between the sixth and the twelfth week. What counts is how often you do the exercises, not how long they last.
Does rumination cause depression, or the other way round? Both. Prospective follow-up studies show that the tendency to ruminate precedes and predicts depressive episodes, and depression in turn increases rumination. That is what makes this work interesting: it acts on a factor, not only on a symptom.
I ruminate about serious, real things. Is that still rumination? Yes, the seriousness of the subject does not change the mechanism. A real problem deserves concrete thinking, limited in time, leading to an action — not three hours of an abstract loop. And some real subjects have no solution: they call for the giving up described in section 15, which is not indifference.
Is meditation enough? It genuinely helps, and structured programmes have favourable data in preventing depressive relapse. Used on its own and with the aim of making thoughts go away, it disappoints. It works better combined with the move to the concrete and with action.
My mind keeps wandering off, but not onto negative things: is that rumination? That resembles a difficulty with attention more than rumination. The strategy differs: structuring, writing, externalising memory, reducing demands on your attention. See Adult ADHD: organising daily life.
Does writing not risk keeping the loop going? It does, when it merely repeats the complaint. Two safeguards: a timer, and the obligation to finish with a line of action or with the explicit words "subject closed". With these rules, writing is one of the most effective tools.
Those close to me tell me to stop thinking about it, and it annoys me: what should I say to them? It is understandable on both sides: they see your suffering and do not know what to do, and the instruction adds a failure for you. Offer them a precise instruction instead: name it without judging, ask the concrete question, and suggest an activity.